Nigeria: NISO Explains Why Part Of Nigeria Is Experiencing Power Outage
Ghana: GNPC To Host 7th APPO NOC CEOs Meeting In Accra
Egypt: Bp Signs MoU To Drill 5 Oil Wells In The Mediterranean
Nigeria: Buhari Threatened To Sack Me For Recommending Subsidy Removal — Kachikwu
Nigeria: NUPENG Suspends Two-Day Strike
Ghana: Energy Media Group Opens Nominations For 9th Ghana Energy Awards, Closes October 31
Source: https://energynewsafrica.com EU Court Upholds Green Label For Gas And Nuclear Energy
The General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europe’s second-highest court, ruled on Wednesday that the EU has the right to label some natural gas and nuclear projects as “sustainable investments,” dismissing a challenge brought by Austria.
In 2022, the European Commission updated in 2022 its Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation covering certain gas and nuclear activities. Under the new taxonomy, some gas projects, including several pipelines, were given a “sustainable investment” status. Gas projects are “transitional” if they contribute to the transition from coal to renewables, the EU says. Faced with uncertainty in energy supply after the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the energy crisis that followed, the EU allowed certain nuclear and gas projects to be classed as “sustainable investments”. In its ruling today, the General Court said that “The Commission was entitled to take the view that certain economic activities in the nuclear energy and fossil gas sectors can, under certain conditions, contribute substantially to climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation.” With this ruling, the court dismissed Austria’s action against the inclusion of nuclear energy and fossil gas in the sustainable investment framework. Austria had sought an annulment of the regulation. But the court sided with the Commission and noted that the EC “was entitled to take the view that nuclear energy generation has near to zero greenhouse gas emissions and that there are currently no technologically and economically feasible low-carbon alternatives at a sufficient scale, such as renewable energy sources, to cover the energy demand in a continuous and reliable manner.” “The approach taken by the 2022 delegated regulation is a gradual approach based on a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in stages, while allowing for security of supply,” the General Court said. The court’s decision is “very regrettable,” Austrian Climate Minister Norbert Totschnig said in a statement sent to AFP. Environmentalists weren’t happy with the court’s ruling, either. “A dark day for the climate. The ruling is a major setback for climate and consumer protection,” Martin Kaiser, executive director of Greenpeace Germany, said. “With this ruling, the European Court of Justice legitimizes greenwashing in the financial sector and undermines Europe’s climate targets,” Kaiser added. Source: Oilprice.comKenya: Tourist Dies After Sudden Collapse At Kenya’s Olkaria Geothermal Spa
Ghana: Energy Minister Inaugurates Electricity Market Oversight Panel (EMOP)
Zambia: ZESCO Blames Intermittent Power Supply On System Instability
Zambia’s power utility company, ZESCO Limited, has attributed the recent power outages experienced in parts of the country to system instability in its network.
The power distributor acknowledged the inconvenience caused and apologised to affected residents.
In a statement, ZESCO assured the public that its technical teams are working diligently to restore normal supply.
“Our technical teams are actively working to resolve these challenges and restore stable supply in the shortest possible time,” the company said.
Despite the challenges, ZESCO reiterated its commitment to providing reliable service and pledged to continue updating the public as the situation evolves.
“We appreciate your patience and understanding,” the statement concluded.
Source: https://energynewsafrica.comEthiopia: Prime Minister Abiy Commissions Africa’s Largest 5,000MW Hydropower Dam
The reservoir created by the dam has flooded an area larger than Greater London. The government says this will help provide a steady water supply for irrigation downstream and limit both floods and droughts.
However, Ethiopia’s downstream neighbours have viewed the project with concern since construction began in 2011.
Egypt, which built its own Aswan High Dam on the Nile in the 1960s, fears the GERD could restrict its water supply during droughts and potentially set a precedent for other upstream dams. Its Foreign Ministry wrote to the U.N. Security Council, arguing that the inauguration violated international law.
Cairo has long opposed the project, citing water treaties from the early 20th century and describing the dam as an existential threat. Egypt has stated it reserves the right to “take all appropriate measures to defend and protect the interests of the Egyptian people.”
While refraining from direct reprisals against Ethiopia, Cairo has strengthened ties in recent years with Addis Ababa’s regional rivals, notably Eritrea.
Sudan, meanwhile, has echoed Egypt’s call for a legally binding agreement on the dam’s filling and operation but also stands to benefit from improved flood control and access to affordable electricity.
Ethiopia has filled the reservoir in phases since 2020, insisting the process would not significantly harm downstream countries. Independent research supports this claim, noting that so far no major disruptions to downstream water flow have been recorded—thanks to both favourable rainfall and the phased filling of the reservoir during wet seasons over a five-year period.
Source: https://energynewsafrica.com 

