- The proponents of nuclear power must compensate for decades of misinformation by the well-organised anti-nuclear movement.
- The entire regulatory framework surrounding nuclear energy needs to be overhauled to enable speedy and cost-efficient construction, thereby incentivising investments in the nuclear industry.
- Universities need to encourage the training and education of future nuclear engineers and research into advanced reactor designs.
New Report Blasts EU Nuclear Policy And Warns Prosperity Is Impossible Without Reconsidering Nuclear
Ghana: Cabinet Approves Lithium Exploration Policy
Equatorial Guinea: Be Project Partners Not Service Providers—Ondo Tells Russian Companies
Oil Giant ADNOC Pursues $50 Billion Worth Of New Deals
Nigeria: Navy Chief Vows To Punish Officers Involved In Oil Theft
Price Volatility In The Oil Market Is Dangerous Thing—OPEC
Ghana: GRIDCo Pre-Inspects 200MW Amandi Energy GIS Plant In Aboadze
Nigeria: Port Harcourt Refinery Ready In December 2023—Says Tinubu
Kenya: KETRACO Acquires Transformers To Facilitate Completion Of 220kV Turkwel – Ortum – Kitale Transmission Project

Saudi Arabia Extends Voluntary Cut On Oil Production To September
Ghana: NPA Announces Roll Out Of CRM In September As Four LPG Bottling Plants Ready
He said the CRM policy would run side by side with the current system until the programme is fully implemented across the country.
Asked when the authority expects the transition period for the current system to end, Mr Okudzeto could not provide a specific but said the authority has been engaging all stakeholders to agree on the date.
“Some people think three years while others are also saying five and 10 years so we are still discussing it,” he said.
He urged the LPG Marketing Companies to embrace the programme, saying, “I believe the policy is going to put more money in their pockets.”
He said there would be new jobs, stating that NPA is going to issue new licences for the transportation of filled LPG cylinders to the exchange points.
Touching on the pricing, Mr Okudzeto said the authority would make sure that there would be no increase in the cost of LPG, adding that they are engaging the Ministry of Finance on the possibility of scrapping some of the taxes on LPG.
The target of the CRM is to achieve 50 per cent consumption of LPG by 2030.
The Head of Gas at the Gas Directorate of NPA, Mr Obed Kraine Boakye, in a presentation detailing the background to the Cylinder Recirculation Model policy, noted that Cabinet, in 2017, directed NPA to implement CRM in line with the country’s National LPG promotion policy.
He said the goal is to ensure that there is access to safe, clean and environmentally friendly fuel.
“We believe CRM is safer than the current system,” he said.
After the press encounter, the authority led journalists to visit GOIL Plc LPG Bottling plant in Tema and Sigma Cylinder Manufacturing Company in the North industrial area in Accra.
Meanwhile, the Vice Chairman of the LPG Marketers Association, Gabriel Kumi, has urged the regulator, NPA, not to rush in implementing the policy.
He said the association wants enough time for the transition to take place.

Niger: Nigeria Suspends Electricity Supply To Niger Over Coup
Ghana: Petrol, Diesel Prices Shoot Up By 50 Pesewas
Nigeria: Lagos High Court Blocks Powercom’s Acquisition Of KEDCO
A High Court in Lagos in the Federal Republic of Nigeria has restrained Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Bureau of Public Enterprises and Sahelian Power SPV Limited, from naming Powercom or any other investor as a core shareholder in Kano Electricity Distribution Company (KEDCO).
The court presided over by Justice Nicholas Oweibi, also barred the respondents from conducting or recognising any other bidding process for selling Sahelian’s 60 per cent shares in the Kano Electricity Distribution Company.
Other respondents affected by the orders are Fidelity Bank, the receiver manager, Patrick Ikwueto SAN, Kano Electricity Distribution Company Plc. and Powercom Smart Grid Nigeria Limited.
The applicant, Future Energies Africa (FEA) Limited, which is a consortium of local and international investors, told the court that the process that produced Powercom Smart Grid Nigeria (PSGN) as the preferred company to take over the Kano Electricity Distribution Plc (KEDCO) was flawed.
The applicant had also claimed that NERC and Powercom failed to comply with the guidelines and requirements of the federal government, as laid down by the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) and NERC itself.
BPE is the agency in the custody of the government’s 40 per cent stake in the electricity distribution asset, leaving Fidelity Bank with the temporary ownership stake of the remaining 60 per cent.
Through a receiver manager, in collaboration with the BPE, Fidelity Bank initiated a bidding process to get a technically sound and financially competent buyer to acquire the bank’s stake in KEDCO.
A few days ago, Powercom had, via a statement, announced its acquisition of KEDCO.
Speaking to the press, Adam Ibrahim (an investor and consortium member of FEA), however, faulted the premise of Powercom’s acquisition announcement with the revelation that the company could not claim to have acquired KEDCO when Future Energies had already completed the execution of contracts and agreements through a share sale and purchase agreement to acquire the shares that both BPE and NERC are aware of.
Ibrahim stated that FEA had “no recourse than to seek legal action having filed a complaint to BPE and NERC that fell on deaf ears. FEA is further surprised that NERC, despite (a) its knowledge of a signed share sale and purchase agreement, (b) agreed on transaction terms as forwarded to it by BPE and Fidelity’s representative, and (c) a subsequent complaint by Future Energies regarding Fidelity Bank’s attempt to scuttle the completed process, still issued a ‘No Objection’ for PowerCom.”
Future Energies claimed that it had won the earlier bid after a rigorous review and screening process that lasted almost a year, alongside other bidders, and was given a ‘No Objection’ approval by the BPE after meeting the requirements for acquisition as laid down in guidelines set by BPE and NERC.
However, FEA revealed that for some undisclosed reasons, Fidelity Bank, which is the interim owner of the 60 per cent stake in the entity, decided to halt the process and approve another bidder after having already signed a valid and binding contract to sell the shares to Future Energies.
Ibrahim said, “My consortium—Future Energies Africa Limited (FEA)—was interested in the Kano Distribution Company, and we put in a bid through Fidelity (and its receiver manager) and BPE, which is the entity responsible for approving the guidelines and overseeing the bid process.
“The guidelines were communicated to us by BPE through Fidelity Bank. Shockingly, there is an attempt to destroy the investment and time we spent putting together a competent bid with no explanation.
“We went through the process, sent in an expression of interest alongside other bidders that were interested in the asset. After a long process and evaluation of us and other bidders, we emerged as the new core investor and got approval from Fidelity Bank through the receiver manager, to take over the asset. We also obtained a ‘No Objection’ from BPE.
“We negotiated the core contract that guides the sale of a company, which is the sale and purchase agreement (SPA). We negotiated the document, signed it and Fidelity Bank sent it over to BPE for the BPE to sign the shareholders’ agreement, which is the document that guides all the shareholders in an entity.
“In the process of negotiating the shareholders’ agreement, we understood that a call was placed by Fidelity Bank, telling BPE to halt the process of signing the shareholders’ agreement, even though we had signed the sale and purchase agreement to acquire the asset.
“They (Fidelity Bank) decided to secretly reopen the bid, and they hired PwC to begin a fresh bid process. They also secretly introduced other new companies in the process. We were told to just resubmit our documents, and we had no idea there was a new competitive process after we had already concluded our transaction. We assumed this submission of documents was just for internal purposes. Nonetheless, we reserved all of our rights under the binding contract.”
He added, “The second bidding process doesn’t conform with all of the government’s guidelines and requirements. The risk is that we may end up in the same situation whereby you are selling assets to entities that do not have the technical or financial capabilities to turn around the business.”
Source: https://energynewsafrica.com


